Professional book writers still have proofreaders and editors up to this day, but why is it that there's a rush to drive away manual testers? There's probably an AI tool somewhere out there to check the book's grammar and spelling errors. But what the AI cannot do (for now) is assure the quality of your book - ensuring consistency, style, voice, the quality of how the sentences are written, and identifying plot holes. How good is the story overall? What specific plot points can be improved? Are the characters well-written? Is there enough build-up before the climax? Comparing this to software testing, I believe that the same thing applies. Testing beyond what the requirement tells you, beyond what you see in plain sight is where the real value of a QA stands. However, from time to time you'll see companies or hear some people undermine the value of QA. Some even think you don't need any skills to do this. It's like they're saying you can pick up any random p...
Software testing and etc.